OK, lets join the fantasyland that Debbie "Wuzz-a-man" Shultz lives in, and assume that the Federal Gov't isn't too big, and should do more because it's helping turn this economy around. Now that we have gum drops instead of rain, and the only pitfall is avoiding the unicorn crap on the ground, and the constitution is made of rubber, we can bend it to the will and whim of our "democracy". Is there anything, anything at all that the federal government can't take control of? YOU WILL encounter people in this country that think that there is no problem too small for the federal gov't to deal with. The states just have to mirror the fed, they aren't allowed to think for themselves, and they sure as hell better not enact laws that disagree with the fed policy, or they will get sued by the Fed. What do we need state gov't for? The next logical progression of this progressive world is to subjugate the individual to the good of the whole. This means that if you are a great maker of toothpics, and you want to get into making tennis rackets, too bad, the state needs you making toothpics. Sounds too Orwellian, huh?
We are at a crossroads this election cycle. We have been taken on a collision course with some very tough times. As Britain is set aside in Europe, and Europe is consolidating under the financial strain of leftists...Russia is rattling sabres, China is looking for energy and the Middle East is wide open as we lose all our allies in the region. Is there anything else that needs to happen to make 1936 sound all-to-familiar? Maybe we can have a grassroots effort in the US to blame the Jews on Wallstreet for everyone's problems, and then allow Palestinians gain statehood in the UN which should make Israel very secure with their arsenal...hmmm, perhaps the only thing we are missing in this orgy of idiocy is a leader? Who do we want to lead us...maybe a MESSIAH ordained by the poor for his titmouse promises of everything to everyone? FDR is so loved by the left for all his feelgood policies...of which every one is broke, or dragging down other aspects of the economy. FDR also appointed 8 of 9 supreme court appointees in the 30's and 40's which watered down the constitution in order for him to seize power which has never been ceded back to the states. or...
Do we need someone who is defiantly against military action without congressional approval? Someone who wants the States to deal with State issues like education, health care, labor relations, energy policy and transportation. Maybe the federal gov't could then solve the issues it is charged with in the constitution? maybe? But one thing is certain, we wouldn't need all those people in the gov't wasting our money. They could be added to the list of qualified, unqualified, semi qualified and overqualified people looking for work. Yes, that sounds like a bad thing, but it isn't. Think about this, if we fired every person who isn't elected to office in the gov't, then had everyone apply again, but the budgets are cut by 50%, are the lazy idiots going to get rehired? nope, the good ones would, and the lazy idiots go back to what they are supposed to do...starve, or find a talent or skill to survive. Anyone that thinks they are too good to pick strawberries, but still want a paycheck without doing anything constructive, SHOULD STARVE TO DEATH. For the good of the State.
REV
No comments:
Post a Comment